Results tagged “Google”

You may remember that about half a year ago I had some thoughts about how to change the photo hosting platform for this blog. Up to that day I used Flickr when I recognized that they had changed their licenses and external linking policy. The new conditions in the license and policy did not allow embedding of photos from external locations anymore. Since that time I've been using a workaround (by embedding Google Photo images via the legacy Picasa Web albums interface) for the images in my blog postings.

Well, it seems that Flickr/Yahoo has revised their decision again. I guess it has something to do with their tries to get back into mainstream again and is very probable connected to their incredible 1TB Flickr relaunch.

But not only do they allow external embedding again, they even reenabled that functionality at a much more accessible location than before. Via the "Share" symbol, which is available at any location within Flickr, you can immediately access the sharing/embedding menu for photos or albums on Flickr.

For me personally this makes the decision not easier. Back in November I began using Googles services for photo hosting which allows embedding but is not really straightforward as it requires the workaround I mentioned above (via the Picasaweb-interface) to retrieve the sharing HTML code. And that code wasn't 100% correct as it contained some invalid links which I had to fix manually.

I guess, I'll switch back to Flickr again for new albums in the future but continue to use Google Photos/Picasaweb for the ones which I created there. It's nice to see that there are still some companies out there who reconsider past decisions and revert them. Enabling integration of provided services at independend locations instead of locking in any data/files/information the users provide is in my opinion a key factor to make it possible for others to leverage the services to otherwise impossible solutions.

|

This is a late post on the never-ending discussion about the data privacy inside large companies, especially such data-centric ones like Google and Facebook (see later in the post). In this posting I'm referring mostly to Google and Facebook but be aware that similar discussions and many related topics are not at all limited to these companies and I just take the most known ones as an example. I'm writing this because it gets more frequently in the recent weeks that I'm involved in talks and discussions about privacy issues on different internet services, so here I try to write down my own position. I'm trying to back most of my comments with references here (be sure to check them out if you want to understand my point of view) but of course I'm already biased so take this as my completely personal opinion as of the end of 2010!

Why I have trust in Google

Google had to take a heavy hit when it publicly announced that it had found out that there was payload data from unencrypted WLANs stored during their StreetView programme and recently because people sent email and passwords over unencrypted WLAN.

For me, contrary to aparently most other opinions, this causes Google to rise in my trust because I'm very sure that any other company which had a similar incident would do everything to prevent public knowledge of this. Not so Google. They proactively stepped forward, disclosed the data acquisition accident and invited public authorities to come in to review and check the collected data before they are deleting it without further processing.

The company must have known very well that these actions would impact its image but this didn't stop it from further cooperation in almost any aspect of this incident. For example an evaluation of official british privacy groups found no evidence of personal data in the StreetView logs although this was again stated as a disappointment (german) by other data protection groups later on. Google also let an external company review the whole process of the data acuisition and processing for the StreetView programme which came to the conclusion that the whole process did at no point analyze or process recorded data from connections in the WLAN. It really did only enough processing of the WLAN headers to be able to locate the WLAN, which was the whole point of this programme.

Collecting WLAN data and positions is common practice and many companies have specialized in the area of geolocation via WLAN IDs (eg. SkyHook and even Apple itself), yet only Google is ranked high in the news for data breach while almost nobody criticises these other companies or thinks of real attackers who are surfing the streets and scanning unencrypted WLANs for importand data. For software developers and engineers it's almost clear that the data breach of Google was really just an oversight (german) during the software development and I certainly salute Google to bite the bullet for a whole industry branch. It even takes complaints from its competitors who think that during this public criticism on Google is the right time to take the chance and join beating the rival.

In my opinion Google was (and still is) one of the most respectable companies if the topic is about data security. There were of course other minor accidents with data privacy but almost every time they reacted fast and closed the holes or changed the processes within a very short timespan. As of my knowledge there has only been one incident where an internal maintenance employee who, because of its maintenance activities had access to users' data, abused his rights and accessed users' data without their consent or internal maintenance reasons. Google did react on this but I think it could have done faster and with a more clear statement.

As a final hint, if someone is really interested what data Google collects for each person hop over to the Google Privacy Center and read the small and (in my opinion) quite clear (compared to any other) privacy statement. There you also have the possibility to access the Google Privacy Dashboard where you can yiew and manage almost all the data stored with your account, change the Google ads preferences or even opt-out of it and disable the statistics collection by Google Analytics. It even maintains a publicly availale list of requests from governments to Google for removing content or providing user information.

Why I have no trust in Facebook

Try to find such features on sites like Facebook. In fact Facebook already has a quite impressive list of similar privacy issues, ranging from simple data collection features for crawlers (which is still available to this date) to collecting data of users without accounts on Facebook (german). Although Facebook has often said to tighten up their privacy settings and make it easy for users to adjust them it's still a very complicated process to strip down your privacy options and requires constant review of your sharing settings when you don't want to keep the default settings and share your data with the whole world. There already have been privacy support applications created which assist you in checking and correcting Facebooks privacy settings via easier interfaces. How sick is this? Some people even think to the extend that Facebook should just give in and simply sell your data right away.

Of course Facebook serves its original purpose, connecting people and sharing information, quite well and it may be the ideal tool for many people to do so. But in fact, I doubt that most of the users on Facebook are really aware to which extend Facebook really collects and connects information which is provided in known and unknown means by its users.

My conclusion

In the end I'm always a bit confused and disappointed when people state that they don't trust a certain big company because of "privacy reasons" without having a real justification at hand to do so and then maybe even take this discussion to their Facebook, Twitter or MySpace. I personally still give Google a magnitude of trust in advance of sites like Facebook and from my current point of view there is not much possibility to change my opinion or see me creating an account on this site in the near future.

|

1

Archives